Can Financial Incentives Reduce Declared COVID-19 Vaccine Refusal? Survey Evidence from Poland
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15611/fins.2026.2.01Keywords:
COVID-19 vaccination, financial incentives, behavioral factors, PolandAbstract
Aim: To examine the declared potential of financial public-policy instruments among Polish vaccine refusers and identify behavioural factors associated with vaccination status.
Methodology: A cross-sectional CAWI survey (Poland, 2021, N = 800) distinguished four vaccination attitude levels. Declared responses to financial instruments were tested with non-parametric methods, incentive susceptibility with rank correlation and linear regression, and vaccination status with exploratory models.
Findings: The vaccination lottery was rated low across all groups. Differences among the vaccinated, the hesitant, and those intending to get vaccinated were not significant. For vaccine refusers, no tested financial incentive was rated as likely to change their reported decision; loss-framed incentives were rated higher than gain-framed ones, yet both remained near the lower end of the scale.
Implications: The results indicated the limited declared potential of individual financial incentives among vaccine refusers, raising questions about the efficiency of public spending for this group.
Originality/value: The article adds a behavioural perspective to research on COVID-19 vaccination incentives. Refusers placed little importance on financial benefits, while exploratory models linked vaccination status to vaccine safety beliefs, severe COVID-19 in someone close, and political identification.
Downloads
References
Beard, F., Hendry, A. J., Gidding, H. F., Dey, A., Macartney, K., Leask, J., & McIntyre, P. (2024). Impact of Australia’s No Jab, No Pay policy on vaccination uptake: A before-after study in two national birth cohorts. The Lancet Regional Health – Western Pacific, 54, Article 101259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanwpc.2024.101259
Campos-Mercade, P., Meier, A. N., Schneider, F. H., Meier, S., Pope, D. G., & Wengström, E. (2021). Monetary incentives increase COVID-19 vaccinations. Science, 374(6569), 879–882. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abm0475
Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 627–668. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.627
Dubé, E., Vivion, M., & MacDonald, N. E. (2015). Vaccine hesitancy, vaccine refusal and the anti-vaccine movement: Influence, impact and implications. Expert Review of Vaccines, 14(1), 99–117. https://doi.org/10.1586/14760584.2015.964212
European Court of Auditors. (2022). EU COVID-19 vaccine procurement: Sufficient doses secured after initial challenges, but performance of the process not sufficiently assessed (Special Report No. 19/2022). https://op.europa.eu/webpub/eca/special-reports/covid19-vaccines-19-2022/en/
Fryer, R. G., Jr., Levitt, S. D., List, J. A., & Sadoff, S. (2022). Enhancing the efficacy of teacher incentives through framing: A field experiment. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 14(4), 269–299. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20190287
Griffith, J., Marani, H., & Monkman, H. (2021). COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in Canada: Content analysis of tweets using the theoretical domains framework. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(4), Article e26874. https://doi.org/10.2196/26874
Hameleers, M., & Boukes, M. (2021). The effect of gain-versus-loss framing of economic and health prospects of different COVID-19 interventions: An experiment integrating equivalence and emphasis framing. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 33(4), 927–945. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edab027
Huynh, J., Jacinto, C., & Huynh, J. (2026). Vaccine incentives harm intrinsic motivation: Evidence from a priming experiment. Health Economics, 35(2), 312–331. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.70061
Jacobson, M., Chang, T. Y., Shah, M., Pramanik, R., & Shah, S. B. (2022). Can financial incentives and other nudges increase COVID-19 vaccinations among the vaccine hesitant? A randomized trial. Vaccine, 40(43), 6235–6242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.08.060
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185
Kamenica, E. (2012). Behavioral economics and psychology of incentives. Annual Review of Economics, 4, 427–452. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-080511-110909
Karing, A., Finetti, J., & Kuloszewski, Z. (2024). Incentives and motivation crowd-out: Experimental evidence from childhood immunization. Becker Friedman Institute. https://bfi.uchicago.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Karing.Incentivesand-Motivation-Crowd-Out-Experimental-Evidence-from-Childhood-Immunization.pdf
Kuznetsova, L., Diago-Navarro, E., Mathu, R., & Trilla, A. (2022). Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination mandates and incentives in Europe. Vaccines, 10(10), Article 1714. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10101714
Lewandowski, P., & Madoń, K. (2022). Skuteczność szczepień przeciw COVID-19 w Polsce (IBS Policy Paper 1/2022). Instytut Badań Strukturalnych. https://ibs.org.pl/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/IBS_policy_paper_01_2022.pdf
Li, S. K., Chen, N., Chan, E., & Guo, Y. J. (2024). Loss framing increases entity theorists’ vaccine uptake. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 41(4), 745–760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2024.04.002
Mellström, C., & Johannesson, M. (2008). Crowding out in blood donation: Was Titmuss right? Journal of the European Economic Association, 6(4), 845–863. https://doi.org/10.1162/JEEA.2008.6.4.845
Milkman, K. L., Gandhi, L., Ellis, S. F., Graci, H. N., Gromet, D. M., Mobarak, R. S., Buttenheim, A. M., Duckworth, A. L., Pope, D. G., Stanford, A., Thaler, R. H., & Volpp, K. G. (2022). A citywide experiment testing the impact of geographically targeted, high-payoff vaccine lotteries. Nature Human Behaviour, 6(11), 1515–1524. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01437-0
O’Keefe, D. J., & Jensen, J. D. (2007). The relative persuasiveness of gain-framed and loss-framed messages for encouraging disease prevention behaviors: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Health Communication, 12(7), 623–644. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730701615198
O’Keefe, D. J., & Jensen, J. D. (2009). The relative persuasiveness of gain-framed and loss-framed messages for encouraging disease detection behaviors: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Communication, 59(2), 296–316. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01417.x
Opolski Urząd Wojewódzki. (2021). Rząd zachęca do szczepień. Opolskie gminy mogą otrzymać spore fundusze. https://www.gov.pl/web/uw-opolski/rzad-zacheca-do-szczepien-opolskie-gminy-moga-otrzymac-spore-fundusze
PAP MediaRoom. (2021, November 17). Ponad 4,3 mln dorosłych Polaków wzięło udział w Loterii Narodowego Programu Szczepień. Polska Agencja Prasowa. https://www.pap.pl/mediaroom/1002655%2Cponad-43-mln-doroslych-polakowwzielo-udzial-w-loterii-narodowego-programu
Pink, S. L., Chu, J., Druckman, J. N., Rand, D. G., & Willer, R. (2021). Elite party cues increase vaccination intentions among Republicans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 118(32), Article e2106559118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2106559118
Podlaski Urząd Wojewódzki w Białymstoku. (2021a). Konkurs dla gmin „Rosnąca Odporność”. https://www.gov.pl/web/uwpodlaski/konkurs-dla-gmin-rosnaca-odpornosc
Podlaski Urząd Wojewódzki w Białymstoku. (2021b). Konkursy dla gmin: Gmina na Medal #SzczepimySię i Najbardziej Odporna Gmina. https://www.gov.pl/web/uw-podlaski/konkursy-dla-gmin-gmina-na-medal-szczepimysie-i-najbardziejodporna-gmina
Polski Instytut Ekonomiczny. (2021, April 26). Motywacją do szczepień jest poczucie odpowiedzialności za innych. https://pie.net.pl/motywacja-do-szczepien-jest-poczucie-odpowiedzialnosci-za-innych/
Rothman, A. J., & Salovey, P. (1997). Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: The role of message framing. Psychological Bulletin, 121(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.3
Volpp, K. G., & Cannuscio, C. C. (2021). Incentives for immunity: Strategies for increasing COVID-19 vaccine uptake. New England Journal of Medicine, 385(1), Article e1. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp2107719
Walkey, A. J., Law, A., & Bosch, N. A. (2021). Lottery-based incentive in Ohio and COVID-19 vaccination rates. JAMA, 326(8), 766–767. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.11048
Winch, G. M., Cao, D., Maytorena-Sanchez, E., Pinto, J., Sergeeva, N., & Zhang, S. (2021). Operation Warp Speed: Projects responding to the COVID-19 pandemic. Project Leadership and Society, 2, Article 100019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plas.2021.100019
Wróblewski, M., Bartnicki, M., Stankowska, J., Meler, A., & Kawiak-Jawor, E. (2022). Sukces czy porażka? Społeczna ewaluacja Narodowego Programu Szczepień przeciwko COVID-19: Raport z badań. Łukasiewicz – Instytut Organizacji i Zarządzania w Przemyśle „ORGMASZ”. https://itech.lukasiewicz.gov.pl/en/publikacje/podsumowanie-ewaluacji/
Wróblewski, M., & Meler, A. (2024). Political polarization may affect attitudes towards vaccination: An analysis based on the European Social Survey data from 23 countries. European Journal of Public Health, 34(2), 375–379. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckae002
Downloads
Published
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Agnieszka Smółka-Dolecka
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Accepted 2026-08-28
Published 2026-11-05
