Rekcje młodych dorosłych na zagrożenia środowiskowe w reklamach społecznych: korelaty hormonalne, zachowania konsumenckie i postawy wobec środowiska
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15611/pn.2026.3.03Słowa kluczowe:
reklama społeczna, emocje negatywne, biomarkery stresu, zachowania proekologiczneAbstrakt
Cel: Celem niniejszego badania była ocena wpływu kontaktu z reklamą o tematyce ekologicznej, wywołującą silne negatywne emocje, na krótkotrwałe zmiany stężenia hormonów steroidowych w ślinie (kortyzolu, testosteronu i DHEA) oraz analiza związku tych reakcji hormonalnych z postawami proekologicznymi i etycznym zachowaniem konsumentów.
Metodyka: Badanie przeprowadzono w dwóch etapach. W pierwszym etapie wykonano test wstępny (N = 139) w celu zidentyfikowania reklamy wideo o tematyce środowiskowej postrzeganej jako wywołującej najsilniejsze negatywne emocje. Następnie przeprowadzono quasi-eksperyment z jedną grupą (N = 22), w ramach którego pobrano próbki śliny 5 minut przed oraz 5 minut po ekspozycji na reklamę. Stężenia hormonów oceniono za pomocą testu ELISA, natomiast postawy proekologiczne i zachowania konsumenckie zmierzono przy użyciu skali New Environmental Paradigm (NEP) oraz skali Ethically Minded Consumer Behavior (EMCB).
Wyniki: Reklama wywołała istotne zmiany hormonalne u mężczyzn, w tym spadek poziomu kortyzolu i stosunku kortyzolu do DHEA oraz wzrost stosunku testosteronu do kortyzolu. U kobiet nie zaobserwowano istotnych zmian hormonalnych. Różnice hormonalne przed i po ekspozycji były istotnie powiązane z wybranymi wymiarami NEP i komponentami EMCB, w tym z recyklingiem oraz gotowością do zapłacenia wyższej ceny za produkty etyczne.
Implikacje i rekomendacje: Wyniki badania wskazują, że markery fizjologiczne mogą wspierać ocenę przetwarzania ryzyka emocjonalnego w komunikacji środowiskowej oraz stanowić podstawę do projektowania kampanii uwzględniających różnice płci. W przyszłych badaniach warto uwzględnić większe próby oraz sprawdzić, czy reakcje hormonalne pozwalają przewidywać długoterminowe zmiany zachowań. Biorąc pod uwagę eksploracyjny charakter badania, małą liczebność próby i projekt z jedną grupą, wyniki należy interpretować jako wstępne i wymagające potwierdzenia.
Oryginalność/wartość: Badanie przedstawia nowatorskie podejście psychofizjologiczne do reklamy środowiskowej poprzez połączenie biomarkerów hormonalnych z postawami wobec środowiska oraz etycznymi zachowaniami konsumenckimi.
Pobrania
Bibliografia
Achar, C., So, J., Agrawal, N., & Duhachek, A. (2016). What We Feel and Why We Buy: The Influence of Emotions on Consumer Decision-Making. Current Opinion in Psychology, 10, 166-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.01.009
Adebayo, W. G. (2025). Resilience in the Face of Ecological Challenges: Strategies for Integrating Environmental Considerations into Social Policy Planning in Africa. Sustainable Development, 33(1), 203-220. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3113
Alden, D. L., Basil, M. D., & Deshpande, L. (2011). Communications in Social Marketing. In G. Hastings, K. Angus, & C. Bryant (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Social Marketing (pp. 167-177). SAGE Publications.
Bakir, V., Herring, E., Miller, D., & Robinson, P. (2019). Organized Persuasive Communication: A New Conceptual Framework for Research on Public Relations, Propaganda and Promotional Culture. Critical Sociology, 45(3), 311-328. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920518764586
Berger, J., Moe, W. W., & Schweidel, D. A. (2023). What Holds Attention? Linguistic Drivers of Engagement. Journal of Marketing, 87(5), 793-809. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222429231152880
Bos, P. A., Panksepp, J., Bluthé, R.-M., & van Honk, J. (2012). Acute Effects of Steroid Hormones and Neuropeptides on Human Social–Emotional Behavior: A Review of Single Administration Studies. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, 33(1), 17-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yfrne.2011.01.002
Briscoe, M. D., Givens, J. E., Hazboun, S. O., & Krannich, R. S. (2019). At Home, in Public, and in between: Gender Differences in Public, Private and Transportation Pro-Environmental Behaviors in the US Intermountain West. Environmental Sociology, 5(4), 374-392. https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2019.1628333
Casto, K. V., & Edwards, D. A. (2016). Testosterone, Cortisol, and Human Competition. Hormones and Behavior, 82, 21-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2016.04.004
Celik, S. (2020). The Effects of Climate Change on Human Behaviors. In S. Fahad, M. Hasanuzzaman, M. Alam, H. Ullah, M. Saeed, I. Ali Khan, & M. Adnan (Eds.), Environment, Climate, Plant and Vegetation Growth (pp. 577-589). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49732-3_22
Chalkiadaki, E. S., & Vaida, S. (2023). The Role of Negative Emotions in Climate Change Awareness Advertising. Educatia 21 Journal, (26). https://doi.org/10.24193/ed21.2023.26.13
do Vale, S., & Escera, C. (2018). Dehydroepiandrosterone and Dehydroepiandrosterone-Sulfate and Emotional Processing. In G. Litwack (Ed.), Vitamins and Hormones (vol. 108, pp. 413-441). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.vh.2018.01.022
Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A. G., & Jones, R. E. (2000). New Trends in Measuring Environmental Attitudes: Measuring Endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm: A Revised NEP Scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 425-442. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00176
Durkin, S., Bayly, M., Brennan, E., Biener, L., & Wakefield, M. (2018). Fear, Sadness and Hope: Which Emotions Maximize Impact of Anti-Tobacco Mass Media Advertisements among Lower and Higher SES Groups? Journal of Health Communication, 23(5), 445-461. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2018.1463320
Dutheil, F., de Saint Vincent, S., Pereira, B., Schmidt, J., Moustafa, F., Charkhabi, M., Bouillon-Minois, J.-B., & Clinchamps, M. (2021). DHEA as a Biomarker of Stress: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 12. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.688367
Ettinger, J., Walton, P., Painter, J., & DiBlasi, T. (2021). Climate of Hope or Doom and Gloom? Testing the Climate Change Hope vs. Fear Communications Debate through Online Videos. Climatic Change, 164(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-02975-8
Hamelin, N., Moujahid, O. E., & Thaichon, P. (2017). Emotion and Advertising Effectiveness: A Novel Facial Expression Analysis Approach. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 36, 103-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.01.001
Harth, N. S., Leach, C. W., & Kessler, T. (2013). Guilt, Anger, and Pride about In-Group Environmental Behaviour: Different Emotions Predict Distinct Intentions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 34, 18-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.12.005
Hodson, J. (2019). An Ecological Model of Climate Marketing: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Climate Science Related Attitude and Behavior Change. Cogent Social Sciences, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2019.1625101
Jansson, J., Marell, A., & Nordlund, A. (2010). Green Consumer Behavior: Determinants of Curtailment and Eco-Innovation Adoption. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 27(4), 358-370. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363761011052396
Joseph, N. T., Jiang, Y., & Zilioli, S. (2021). Momentary Emotions and Salivary Cortisol: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Ecological Momentary Assessment Studies. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 125, 365-379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.02.042
Kamenidou, I., Gkitsas, S., Mamalis, S., Mylona, I., Pavlidis, S., & Stavrianea, A. (2025). A Multigenerational Cohort Approach Towards Environmental Attitudes According to the New Ecological Paradigm (NEP) Scale and Perception of Social Marketing Campaigns’ Role. In N. Tsounis, & A. Vlachvei (Eds.), Advances in Applied Microeconomics. International Conference on Applied Economics (ICOAE) 2024. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-76654-1_13
Kennedy, E., & Kmec, J. (2018). Reinterpreting the Gender Gap in Household Pro-Environmental Behaviour. Environmental Sociology, 4(3), 299-310. https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2018.1436891
Kotler, P. (2022). The Battle between Commercial Marketing and Social Marketing. Social Marketing Quarterly, 28(4), 325-331. https://doi.org/10.1177/15245004221136334
Langer, K., Jentsch, V. L., & Wolf, O. T. (2022). Cortisol Promotes the Cognitive Regulation of High Intensive Emotions Independent of Timing. European Journal of Neuroscience, 55(9-10), 2684-2698. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.15182
Lazarus, R. S. (1982). Thoughts on the Relations between Emotion and Cognition. American Psychologist, 37(9), 1019-1024. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.37.9.1019
Lazarus, R., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. Springer.
Levine, L. J., & Pizarro, D. A. (2006). Emotional Valence, Discrete Emotions, and Memory. In B. Uttl, N. Ohta, & A. L. Siegenthaler (Eds). Memory and Emotion: Interdisciplinary Perspectives (pp. 37-58). Blackwell Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756232.ch3
Liu, P., Teng, M., & Han, C. (2020). How Does Environmental Knowledge Translate into Pro-Environmental Behaviors? The Mediating Role of Environmental Attitudes and Behavioral Intentions. Science of The Total Environment, 728, 138126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138126
Marceau, K., Shirtcliff, E. A., Hastings, P. D., Klimes-Dougan, B., Zahn-Waxler, C., Dorn, L. D., & Susman, E. J. (2014). Within- -Adolescent Coupled Changes in Cortisol with DHEA and Testosterone in Response to Three Stressors during Adolescence. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 41, 33-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2013.12.002
Mostafa, M. M. (2020). Neural Correlates of Fear Appeal in Advertising: An fMRI Analysis. Journal of Marketing Communications, 26(1), 40-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527266.2018.1497680
Nadeem, M., Bahadar, S., Gull, A., & Iqbal, U. (2020). Are Women Eco-Friendly? Board Gender Diversity and Environmental Innovation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(8). https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2563
Noble, G., Pomering, A., & Johnson, L. W. (2014). Gender and Message Appeal: Their Influence in a Pro-Environmental Social Advertising Context. Journal of Social Marketing, 4(1), 4-21. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSOCM-12-2012-0049
Odou, P., & Schill, M. (2020). How Anticipated Emotions Shape Behavioral Intentions to Fight Climate Change. Journal of Business Research, 121, 243-253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.08.047
Orzan, G., Serban, C., Iconaru, C., & Macovei, O. I. (2013). Modeling the Impact of Online Social Marketing Campaigns on Consumers’ Environmentally Friendly Behavior. Research Journal of Recent Sciences, 2(3), 14-21.
Peterson, C. K., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2012). Anger and Testosterone: Evidence that Situationally-Induced Anger Relates to Situationally-Induced Testosterone. Emotion, 12(5), 899-902. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025300
Pinkhasov, R. M., Wong, J., Kashanian, J., Lee, M., Samadi, D. B., Pinkhasov, M. M., & Shabsigh, R. (2010). Are Men Shortchanged on Health? Perspective on Health Care Utilization and Health Risk Behavior in Men and Women in the United States. International Journal of Clinical Practice, 64(4), 475-487. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-1241.2009.02290.x
Poels, K., & Dewitte, S. (2019). The Role of Emotions in Advertising: A Call to Action. Journal of Advertising, 48(1), 81-90. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2019.1579688
Rathee, S., & Milfeld, T. (2024). Sustainability Advertising: Literature Review and Framework for Future Research. International Journal of Advertising, 43(1), 7-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2023.2175300
Rodriguez-Sanchez, C. (2023). The Role of Social Marketing in Achieving the Planet’s Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 20, 559-571. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12208-023-00385-3
Rogowska, J., Piątkowska, K., & Głowacz, Z. (2024). Societal Involvement in Household Waste Sorting Behavior in the Context of the Circular Economy: A Case Study of Poland. Sustainability, 16(5), 1841. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16051841
Rundle-Thiele, S., David, P., Willmott, T., Pang, B., Eagle, L., & Hay, R. (2019). Social Marketing Theory Development Goals: An Agenda to Drive Change. Journal of Marketing Management, 35(1-2), 160-181. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2018.1559871
Shields, G. S., Lam, J. C. W., Trainor, B. C., & Yonelinas, A. P. (2016). Exposure to Acute Stress Enhances Decision-Making Competence: Evidence for the Role of DHEA. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 67, 51-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2016.01.031
Sollberger, S., Bernauer, T., & Ehlert, U. (2017). Predictors of Visual Attention to Climate Change Images: An Eye-Tracking Study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 51, 46-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.03.001
Sudbury-Riley, L., & Kohlbacher, F. (2016). Ethically Minded Consumer Behavior: Scale Review, Development, and Validation. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 2697-2710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.11.005
Taufique, K. M. R. (2022). Integrating Environmental Values and Emotion in Green Marketing Communications Inducing Sustainable Consumer Behaviour. Journal of Marketing Communications, 28(3), 272-290. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527266.2020.1866645
van den Broek, K., Bolderdijk, J. W., & Steg, L. (2017). Individual Differences in Values Determine the Relative Persuasiveness of Biospheric, Economic and Combined Appeals. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 53, 145-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.07.009
Vining, R. F., McGinley, R. A., & Symons, R. G. (1983). Hormones in Saliva: Mode of Entry and Consequent Implications for Clinical Interpretation. Clinical Chemistry, 29(10), 1752-1756.
Wei, S., Ang, T., & Jancenelle, V. E. (2018). Willingness to Pay More for Green Products: The Interplay of Consumer Characteristics and Customer Participation. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 45, 230-238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.08.015
Xia, W., & Li, L. M. W. (2023). Societal Gender Role Beliefs Moderate the Pattern of Gender Differences in Public- and Private-Sphere Pro-Environmental Behaviors. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 92, 102158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.102158
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Licencja
Prawa autorskie (c) 2026 Grzegorz Godlewski, Mirosław Zalech, Adam Augustyniak, Jakub Rybka

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Na tych samych warunkach 4.0 Miedzynarodowe.
Accepted 2026-07-21
Published 2026-10-07








