Energy first, friendship forward: Research on the influencing factors of sustainable green energy trade between China and the Asian-African Belt and Road countries

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15611/aoe.2026.2.06

Keywords:

energy trade, Belt and Road Initiative, influencing factors, gravity model

Abstract

Aim: The article examines the determinants of bilateral energy trade between China and 32 Asian-African Belt and Road countries from 2000 to 2020. It investigates how various economic, technological, environmental, and social factors influence energy trade cooperation in the context of the Belt and Road Energy Cooperation Vision and Action Plan and the Belt and Road Energy Partnership. The authors explored direct effects and mediating mechanisms through bilateral political relations and urbanisation, while also analysing the way these impacts vary across different development stages, regions, and income levels.

Methodology: The study employed a gravity model of trade using panel data covering the 21-year period from 2000 to 2020. Key explanatory variables included economic scale (GDP), labour market size, carbon dioxide emissions, air transport volume, mobile cellular subscriptions, renewable energy consumption, electrification rate, medium-high-tech manufacturing value added, and the share of goods and services imports. Bilateral political relations and urbanisation were introduced as mediating variables to examine indirect effects. Robustness tests were conducted to confirm the reliability and validity of the results. The analysis also included heterogeneity analysis to examine variations across different country groupings.

Results: The findings revealed that GDP, renewable energy consumption, and import ratios significantly enhanced China's energy imports, while electrification levels had an inhibiting effect. Economic size was found to enhance bilateral political ties, whereas electrification weakened them. Renewable energy consumption constrained urbanisation, while electrification encouraged it. The heterogeneity analysis demonstrated that impacts varied significantly across development stages, regions, and income levels. GDP and trade openness consistently promoted energy trade across all country groups, but environmental and technological factors showed divergent effects between Middle Eastern and non-Middle Eastern economies, as well as between high-income and low-income countries.

Implications and recommendations: The article suggests that policymakers should leverage economic growth and trade openness as consistent drivers of energy cooperation among the ‘Belt and Road’ countries. Differentiated strategies are needed for countries at various development stages and income levels. For Middle Eastern and non-Middle Eastern countries, and both high-income lowincome economies, tailored approaches addressing environmental and technological factors are essential. The findings highlight the importance of considering renewable energy consumption and electrification rates when designing energy cooperation policies, as these factors have complex effects on both trade volumes and mediating variables such as political relations and urbanisation. Strengthening bilateral political relations through economic engagement can facilitate energy trade cooperation.

Originality/value: This study contributes original insights by comprehensively analysing energy trade determinants within the ‘Belt and Road’ framework using an extensive 21-year panel dataset. It uniquely incorporates mediating variables (bilateral political relations and urbanisation) to reveal indirect mechanisms affecting energy trade. The heterogeneity analysis across development stages, geographical regions (Middle Eastern compared to non-Middle Eastern), and income levels provides nuanced understanding of how factors differentially impact various country groupings. This multidimensional approach offers valuable empirical evidence for understanding the complexities of China's -energy cooperation with Asian-African Belt and Road countries, filling a gap in existing literature on regional energy trade dynamics.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amin, M. D., Badruddoza, S., & McCluskey, J. J. (2021). Does conventional energy pricing induce innovation in renewable energy? New evidence from a nonlinear approach. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 43(2), 659-679. https://doi.org/10.1002/aepp.13148

Arif, I. (2022). Educational attainment, corruption, and migration: An empirical analysis from a gravity model. Economic Modelling, 110, 105802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2022.105802

Aslam, N., Yang, W., Saeed, R., & Ullah, F. (2024). Energy transition as a solution for energy security risk: Empirical evidence from BRI countries. Energy, 290, 130090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.130090

Bloom, D. E., & Freeman, R. B. (1986). The Effects of Rapid Population Growth on Labor Supply and Employment in Developing Countries. Population and Development Review, 12(3), 381. https://doi.org/10.2307/1973216

Chen, W., Niu, X., Ke, W., & Yu, Z. (2023). Investigating the energy trade networks in the Belt and Road regions: Structures and evolution. Energy, 283, 129157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.129157

Chen, Y. (2018). Factors influencing renewable energy consumption in China: An empirical analysis based on provincial panel data. Journal of Cleaner Production, 174, 605-615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.011

Freeman, R., & Lewis, J. (2021). Gravity model estimates of the spatial determinants of trade, migration, and trade-and-migration policies. Economics Letters, 204, 109873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2021.109873

Hoffart, F. M., D’Orazio, P., & Kemfert, C. (2022). Geopolitical and climate risks threaten financial stability and energy transitions. Energy Proceedings, 2004, 2965. https://doi.org/10.46855/energy-proceedings-10325

Hu, J., Wang, D., Zeng, H., & Ma, S. (2025). From disclosure to decision: How climate risk shapes firms’ human capital strategies in China. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 156(10), 556. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-025-05767-7

Karpavicius, T., Balezentis, T., & Streimikiene, D. (2025). Energy security indicators for sustainable energy development: Application to the electricity sector in the context of state economic decisions. Sustainable Development, 33(1), 1381-1400. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3190

Li, J., Zhou, K., & Cheng, Z. (2022). Does China’s “Belt and Road” Initiative promote green total factor productivity growth in countries along the route? Journal of Cleaner Production, 367, 133004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133004

Lin, B., & Zhao, H. (2024). Asymmetric trade barriers and CO2 emissions in the carbon-intensive industry. Journal of Environmental Management, 349, 119547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119547

Lu, Y., & Wolszczak-Derlacz, J. (2025). The impact of China’s One-Belt One-Road initiative on international trade and global value chains. Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics, 32(1), 163-180. https://doi.org/10.1080/16081625.2024.2336122

Ma, S., Benkraiem, R., Abedin, M. Z., & Zeng, H. (2025). Climate anomalies and corporate environmental governance: Empirical evidence from ENSO events. Finance Research Letters, 85, 107970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2025.107970

Mohammed, Y. S., Mustafa, M. W., Bashir, N., & Mokhtar, A. S. (2013). Renewable energy resources for distributed power generation in Nigeria: A review of the potential. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 22, 257-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.01.020

Pérez-Hernández, C. C., Montiel-Hernández, M. G., & Salazar-Hernández, B. C. (2025). Unlocking Green Export Opportunities: Empirical Insights from Southern Cone Economies. Sustainability, 17(5), 2257. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17052257

Schneiders, A., Fell, M. J., & Nolden, C. (2022). Peer-to-peer electricity trading and the sharing economy: Social, markets and regulatory perspectives. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy, 17(1), 2050849. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567249.2022.2050849

Szustak, G., Dąbrowski, P., Gradoń, W., & Szewczyk, Ł. (2021). The Relationship between Energy Production and GDP: Evidence from Selected European Economies. Energies, 15(1), 50. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15010050

Tang, W., Wang, J., Yuan, X., Wang, S., Shao, Q., & Hu, J. (2024). Bilateral political relations and the security of China’s energy imports. Energy Exploration & Exploitation, 42(2), 789-813. https://doi.org/10.1177/01445987231199139

Wang, B., Dong, K., Zhong, W., & Zhao, C. (2024). Can high-quality energy development and energy security achieve a win-win situation? The case of China. Economic Analysis and Policy, 83, 17-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2024.06.004

Yang, Y., Liu, H., & Liu, L. (2024). An evolutionary game for analysis of implementation strategies in inter-regional diffusion of clean technology. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 95, 102009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2024.102009

Yang, Z., Yuan, X., Hu, J., Liu, D., & Tang, W. (2024). The impact of the proportion of renewable energy consumption on geopolitical risks in the United States and the United Kingdom. Energy Exploration & Exploitation, 42(6), 1958-1986. https://doi.org/10.1177/01445987241250268

Yuan, J., Xu, Y., Zhang, X., Hu, Z., & Xu, M. (2014). China’s 2020 clean energy target: Consistency, pathways and policy implications. Energy Policy, 65, 692-700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.09.061

Zhang, H., Ou, Q., Yuan, X., Hu, J., & Tang, W. (2023). Digital development, environmental regulation, and electric power utilization efficiency. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 1055786. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.1055786

Zhao, X., & Wu, Y. (2007). Determinants of China’s energy imports: An empirical analysis. Energy Policy, 35(8), 4235-4246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.02.034

Zhao, Y., Liu, X., Wang, S., & Ge, Y. (2019). Energy relations between China and the countries along the Belt and Road: An analysis of the distribution of energy resources and interdependence relationships. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 107, 133-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.03.007

Downloads

Published

2026-10-16

Issue

Section

Articles

Categories

Received 2025-11-15
Accepted 2026-02-07
Published 2026-10-16